Hey Shadow,
I am finding my reaction to the Alan Chambers statement is taking time to settle into some sort of focus. I suspect that the lack of replies so far to this thread, and only a couple to another in the Ex-gay – Miracle or Myth? forum
http://www.freedom2b.org/forums/exodus-international-president-to-the-gay-community-quotwe039re-sorryquot-t2203/
means that quite a few others may be finding the same is true for them.
Thanks for your links to the two comment articles in your post. Although they are strongly worded, claiming a calculated lack of disclosure in Alan Chambers' statements, I believe the facts and arguments they present support their views. I don't fully agree with them – I think Chambers' thinking as revealed in the apology is too fuzzy to be quite so consciously cynical. But I do think neglecting to mention Exodus International's long relationship to other Exodus brands, especially the Exodus Global Alliance (advocate of GLBT legal oppression in countries like Uganda) is a serious evasion, dishonesty by omission.
As Chambers what does say – well for starters I think the opening car crash story implies a more complete shouldering of responsibility than is actually there in the apology that follows. But I'm not sure that it's intended to be misleading in this way. More likely it's just that Chambers feels more moral responsibility than he can intellectually acknowledge.
The apology itself I find frustratingly vague, with a striking lack of self-examination as to HOW such innocent intentions could have led to such harm. I have a lot of specific thoughts of this kind which I could go through sentence by sentence, but that feels a bit much here in this forum.
What I would say in general is while the orientation change agenda is renounced, the causal theories of homoerotic orientation on which they rely are not – at least not specifically. To me these are the most destructive aspects of the whole ex-gay message – for it means every time you feel desire you see it as a symptom of woundedness, inadequacy, defectiveness.
However, I don't wish to be unfair to Alan Chambers. Echoing a lot of other reactions, I think it is an encouraging first step to real honesty and transparency from within the Christian All-Gay-Sex -Is-Wrong camp. But I await a more open and thorough interrogation of their ideas and practice.
My attention has been drawn by a friend to this recent interview with Chambers on Radio National.
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/religionandethicsreport/a-22ministry22-to-22ex-gays22-closes-down/4783192
I haven't listened to it yet, and I will probably have to take it slowly. I am interested to know other ex-gay survivor reactions, though.
|