Forums

What Would Jesus Do If Invited to a Gay Wedding?

  Page: 1
 
 

Anthony Venn-Brown
 
Joined in 2005
March 2, 2010, 12:53

What Would Jesus Do If Invited to a Gay Wedding?


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-shore/what-would-jesus-do-if-in_b_480013.html


I’ve recently been invited to a couple of gay weddings. So — what with being Christian and all — I asked myself the famous question, “What would Jesus do?” (Which I don’t too often ask myself, actually, since Jesus could, for instance, raise people from the dead and turn water into wine, whereas I can barely drag myself out of bed in the morning and/or turn water into coffee. Safe to say lots of His options are none of mine.)


Wondering what Jesus would do naturally enough led me to the New Testament. And therein I found these quotes:


“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices — mint, dill and cumin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law — justice, mercy and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former. You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel.” (Matthew 23:23-24); and


“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men’s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to.” (Matthew 23:13); and,


“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as you are.” (Matthew 23:15); and, last but hardly least:


“Love your neighbor as yourself,” [said Jesus]. “There is no commandment greater than these.” (Mark 12:31)


When I next went looking for anywhere in the Bible where Jesus says anything — and I mean anything — about homosexuality, I learned that Jesus spent about as much time talking about gays and/or lesbians as I spend talking about button collecting and/or sea horses: none. Of course, it’s entirely possible that Jesus did say crucial things about homosexuality, but that when he did (curse the luck!) no one around him just then happened to have handy an ostrich feather, sappy stick, or whatever it was they used for pens back then. Which would make sense, actually. If you’ve spent any time at all reading the New Testament, you know that Jesus’ disciples weren’t exactly Johnnies-on-the-spot. They were just normal, everyday guys.


Kind of the whole point! Jesus most surely did love him some everyday people.


Throughout the New Testament, the only kind of people with whom Jesus consistently took frightful exception were the very “teachers of the law and Pharisees” we see him dressing down in the passages above. One thing that often gets lost in our considerations of Jesus is the degree to which he is exactly the wrong person to piss off. And you don’t have to spend a lot of time in the New Testament before you understand that the only kind of people who seem to ever truly anger him are those who put religious dogma above what he most stood for, which was God’s compassionate will.


Around Jesus you can whine, lie, shift your loyalties, be late, be greedy, be too ambitious, be stupid, be a coward, be a hypochondriac, constantly complain, fall asleep at every wrong moment — you can do nothing right, and it won’t in the slightest way seem to offend him. But you put dogma ahead of empathy? You transmogrify God’s law into a justification for denying God’s grace?


Then … yikes, man. Then you’ve got yourself a problem no one wants.


I’m not exactly sure how we came to so often consider Jesus-formerly-known-as-The-Carpenter as a kind of a soft, dreamy, namby-pamby sort. (Not that there’s anything wrong with that!) But it’s hard to believe it was from the accounts of Jesus we have in the Gospels. That’s just not the guy on those pages.


Jesus is scary when he’s riled. And the only people who rile him are those who, in His name, set themselves up as sanctimonious judgers of others.


I think I better go to the weddings of my gay friends. I’m almost scared not to. In some of his parables Jesus wasn’t exactly fortune-cookie clear, but he didn’t even almost waffle about his “Love your neighbor as yourself.” He very explicitly declared that the “first and greatest commandment.”


If there’s any wiggle room there, I just don’t see it.


So I’ll attend my gay friends’ weddings, and I’ll do so in the exact same spirit I’d expect them to

attend a similar function of mine. And if it happens that in the course of either of their weddings or receptions I find myself wondering if I’m doing the right thing, I’ll be sure to remember the first miracle of Jesus’ recorded in the Bible. It’s when he turned water into wine. At a wedding.


Then … yikes, man. Then you’ve got yourself a problem no one wants.


I’m not exactly sure how we came to so often consider Jesus-formerly-known-as-The-Carpenter as a kind of a soft, dreamy, namby-pamby sort. (Not that there’s anything wrong with that!) But it’s hard to believe it was from the accounts of Jesus we have in the Gospels. That’s just not the guy on those pages.


Jesus is scary when he’s riled. And the only people who rile him are those who, in His name, set themselves up as sanctimonious judgers of others.


I think I better go to the weddings of my gay friends. I’m almost scared not to. In some of his parables Jesus wasn’t exactly fortune-cookie clear, but he didn’t even almost waffle about his “Love your neighbor as yourself.” He very explicitly declared that the “first and greatest commandment.”


If there’s any wiggle room there, I just don’t see it.


So I’ll attend my gay friends’ weddings, and I’ll do so in the exact same spirit I’d expect them to

attend a similar function of mine. And if it happens that in the course of either of their weddings or receptions I find myself wondering if I’m doing the right thing, I’ll be sure to remember the first miracle of Jesus’ recorded in the Bible. It’s when he turned water into wine. At a wedding.



Ann Maree
 
Joined in 2008
March 6, 2010, 06:37

Hi avb


“Jesus is scary when he’s riled. And the only people who rile him are those who, in His name, set themselves up as sanctimonious judgers of others.”


True.


“I think I better go to the weddings of my gay friends. I’m almost scared not to. In some of his parables Jesus wasn’t exactly fortune-cookie clear, but he didn’t even almost waffle about his “Love your neighbor as yourself.” He very explicitly declared that the “first and greatest commandment.”


I like this a lot! It makes me smile. 🙂


Thank you,


Ann Maree



Ann Maree
 
Joined in 2008
March 6, 2010, 07:16

Actually that link where the article is from has really amusing and thought provoking responses on it. Kept me giggling to myself during this long and quiet night shift. I will enjoy reading all the responses after a decent sleep today. 😀



deafant
 
Joined in 2009
March 6, 2010, 22:52

Jesus by nature of his hanging out with the social outcasts of his day would almost certainly attend a gay wedding in this day and age imho.


It does make me wonder what else he would do nowadays as he broke a lot of the social taboos in his day. What are the social taboos that we have today that werent around back in Jesus’ day? It really pushes the cutting edge further and like I dont relate to him eating with the tax collectors – of course the Americans have their IRS so they can relate to the tax collectors thing – but imagine Jesus hanging with someone like Hitler or Charles Manson and…then you get the idea.


Dont get me wrong but I sometimes get a little peeved with the WWJD syndrome – I think we forget that we are here to make a difference and make the world a better place and extend love to people in different ways. Jesus said greater deeds/things/miracles will you do. He gave us an example for us to follow – thats why I get a lil peeved at the question WWJD cos its clear we can and are able do what is loving and caring. From the simplest of things like smiling at people and making a difference to their day. Not looking at what Jesus would do and making another law out of it all. We have enough religious laws – too many of them – whether written or unwritten, in the form of the bible, creeds, traditions etc. We dont have to keep referring back to what Jesus would do when the baton is passed on to us.



Ann Maree
 
Joined in 2008
March 6, 2010, 23:43

Yeah I think you make a good point, Ant, about the WWJD question. It’s a bit tired, isn’t it? I mean, I’d hope we’d automatically be loving and inclusive and not have to keep going back to kindergarten to be reminded of this. As humans, we do make things very complicated.


Doubleoo Yogi at the above link said something similar that I like:


“What is most disturbing to me is the fact that you felt it AT ALL necessary to consult anything outside yourself to help you decide whether or not you would support your friends. This is just silly. They were certainly nice enough to invite you to their wedding. What else is there to consider?…….The inherent message in this article – that you need permission from a higher being to care for others – is paramountly disturbing.”


On the other hand, another person at the link pointed out that we can’t have all the answers all the time and do need reminders. This is true too but on the whole I think we overanalyse because sometimes that’s easier than loving others beyond our comfort zones.



deafant
 
Joined in 2009
March 9, 2010, 03:01

Yes I agree its good at times to have a reminder – its easier said than done to turn the other cheek and to love your enemy. At the same time its also good to be aiming for Jesus’ teachings but having said that it isnt easy stuff to follow – certainly not for the fainthearted. Likewise Ghandi’s teachings of non-violence is remarkable indeed – following his example was not easy for the Indians of his time.


I really do like that quote you gave from Doubleoo Yogi – that people have to check with their God before being loving and caring its just unthinkable imho.


I think that one of the main things that gets me about WWJD is that it can be an excuse to not think for ourselves. Which is why I like your point about over analyzing. Funny how not using the brain can lead to using it anyway. Why would we have this brain if it wasnt meant to be used?


  Page: 1
 
WP Forum Server by ForumPress | LucidCrew
Version: 99.9; Page loaded in: 0.039 seconds.