Forums

A New Paper re Church Attitudes to Homosexuality

Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6
 
 

iplantolive
 
Joined in 2008
January 4, 2010, 11:26

I’m going to throw another type of ‘love’ into the mix here … Philia love, that is, the friendship love. How often have we seen it happen (in both straight and gay circles) where close friends become partners in the truest sense of the word where their Philia love becomes an Agape love …


I’m also reminded of CS Lewis’ comment in his book ‘The Four Loves’ … “love begins to be a demon the moment he begins to be a god” …



iplantolive
 
Joined in 2008
January 4, 2010, 11:36

Sure. Lets just pray I don’t put my foot in it.


Nope, I don’t think you’ve put your foot in it Sandy … very well argued 🙂



Sandy
 
Joined in 2007
January 4, 2010, 14:46

Thanks MoblieGuy. It’s always touch and go when I get esepically indignant about something. But then nobody here as ever heard me say anything the least bit controversial. 😉



Ann Maree
 
Joined in 2008
January 4, 2010, 16:47

Hi Sandy


You said: “The definition of gay or lesbian has at its core sexual/romantic/eros attraction to someone of the same sex and it is this quality that opposes the heterosexual norm and in doing so makes us “different”.”



I’m sorry but maybe I’m a bit thick.. I don’t understand how we are any different to heteros….. but maybe that’s what you mean – that we are not different? I understand you saying we are different because we are same sex attracted but otherwise isn’t love just love? Don’t we just experience all the types of love that any person of any orientation experiences?


Of course I agree we should have the same rights as everyone else, and yes, we are a long way from being treated equal to heteros because of that heteronormative consciousness you mentioned.


Again you said: “The acknowledgement of eros love between two people of the same sex is the foundation of gay marriage rights which was why it was so bizzare to see it trampled in a paper designed to encourage gay marriage. Despite what Nettleton postulates the reason that most people in Western countries marry is for the public acknowledgement of their eros love for each other. We want that same right for ourselves.”


I can agree with you that most madly in love couples of all orientations are kidding themselves in our society if they really think they are uniting without being under the spell of eros love. Therefore LGBTIQ people should have the same rights to marriage as heteros do in this way.


So are we saying the same thing?


Ann Maree



Sandy
 
Joined in 2007
January 4, 2010, 18:28

Yes I think we are saying the same thing. You’re not thick, its probably my fault. Like I said to MobileGuy its always touch and go when I get indignant about something, often it comes out gibberish. I’m learning.


I do mean that gay people and straight people are essentially the same but for the attraction business. It’s a pretty big but though don’t you think? Same sex attraction is so socially, culturally, politically and, for some, personally profound that it has been named, countless books have been written and lives lost. It’s no small thing this same-sex attraction. As to the rest, I agree, we form, experience and express love the same as anyone else. The ability to love and be loved is, I believe, a human trait and not confined to any one orientation.


Hope that clears that up – sorry for the confusion.



Ann Maree
 
Joined in 2008
January 4, 2010, 20:48

Hi Sandy


Thanks for saying I’m not thick!! 🙂


So if I’m right, I think you’ve been focusing on the huge social and political impacts of being in our community and having same sex relationships. I agree, the ramifications of same sex relating is enormous. Many hetero people don’t realise that there’s a constant process of negotiation and difficult decision making in all kinds of social settings when you’re LGBTIQ. i.e. Holding hands in public is not likely to be premeditated about to the same degree by a hetero person because it’s not questioned by our heteronormative society. And in terms of coming out, I think many don’t know that it can be a process that takes many years, if not a lifetime. It’s usually not just a one-off event. For instance, I came out to immediate family and a couple of close friends gradually over a period of years from 2000 onwards. And yet every time I’ve moved jobs, I’ve had to consider whether to come out or not and how to do this. At one point last year, I didn’t correct the assumption one colleague made that I had a male partner because it was in front of a big group and I wasn’t comfortable talking about such a private and potentially risky subject in front of a group I didn’t know well. Later at the Christmas function, I chose to come out to this person when we were alone and it took her 3 x to hear me using the pronoun ‘she’ before she twigged that I was with a female partner. In the end, she wasn’t negative about it but the process required me to be confident about repeating myself in the face of an uncertain outcome. On a more positive note, coming out to another person, a work friend, on the same day went well but it was also not easy. Although I was fairly confident of what her response would be, there was still a sense of risk, of the unknown. These are the things that heteros never have to consider, much less stress about. All in all it’s not an easy road to be in our community and the more we can redress the imbalances the better.


I agree that to deeply love and be loved are human needs that transcend orientation, history, background etc. And so it seems pointless to me that people are dividing up the different types of love, indicating that our cause can’t be properly acknowledged unless we only promote those cookie cutter, long term, monogamous relationships that have been deemed wholesome by some boring old Christians and others. Oh don’t get me wrong, I like long term relationships and am myself a bit boring. I just believe that not everyone has to stick to those rules to be totally acceptable and I resent that the cookie cutter is repeatedly held up as a standard. Like we should have to conform to some heteronormative model (that usually doesn’t work anyway) to be accepted. I find it offensive.


And I know, avb, that you will say, as you have before, that the wheels of change move slowly, and the church and wider society can only cope with so much at one time. And when it comes to advancing our rights in the church, the promotion of long term, loving relationships within our community rather than promiscuous ones, is the more palatable position for conservative types. And despite what I’ve said above, I do understand the need to strategise and apply change in stages that others can manage and be part of. However it doesn’t mean I can’t be angry.


Ok so that’s my rant. Sandy, you’ve got me fired up now too! Actually it doesn’t take much – I’m quite passionate about these types of things all on my own. I hope no one is offended by my comments. I’m just frustrated by the hoops I perceive we have to jump through when life is already difficult enough.


Ann Maree



Sandy
 
Joined in 2007
January 5, 2010, 22:40

Sometimes its not a bad idea to get fired up about stuff. Indifferance is a tragic thing.


You’re right I don’t think straight people do understand a lot of what we go through but I don’t think it’s because they are all aweful people who systematically and intentionally try to undermine us. For most people they just don’t realise because its not part of their experience in the same way that we, living in an affluent Western country, don’t realise the full extent of the poverty out there, we have this vauge general idea by the real life experience is not known to many people and would be very confronting. Same could be said for the struggles gay people face everyday. Not everyone can know everything about everything. Most people specialise in the things that most affect them, naturally.


That’s just my two cents anyway.



Ann Maree
 
Joined in 2008
January 6, 2010, 03:14

Yes very true. Experience is an amazing teacher. There are many things I wouldn’t really know if it weren’t for actually living them.



murrayd
 
Joined in 2009
January 8, 2010, 01:28

Its good to see the discussion continue..


Sandy I take it that you are still quite young.


I happen to be one of those that the paper is talking about. I am a pensioner and not in good health and to keep my independence I still need extra help. I am under a Government scheme were as I get susidised help and meals through a volunteer service. Most of these volunteer organisations are run by and serviced by Evangelical christian groups. It can make it very hard you have to watch your Ps and Qs.Not leave anything around that may cause problems.


I have been out for more years than I care to remember but in this situation I really have to watch it.So I feel for a lot of Gay elderly people out there.


Not even the Gay community look after their seniors. I can remember when I was young you didnt see many elder gay around. They seemed to disappear after 50

.Even Noel Coward wrote a song “Nobody loves a fairy when shes 40”


Rejection can be very hurtful as gay start to feel the results of old age.

I asK Sandy how many old Gay or Lesbian does she Know.

At least the Govt is trying to work toward something

What a lot of Gay dont realise the number of suicides that have occurred in this age group.

God bless you all



davidt
 
Joined in 2009
January 8, 2010, 08:03

I was really encouraged to read this coming from a Baptist Pastor. Just fantastic!! I strongly support gay marriage.


Murray, I have a theory that older gay folk can be (not always) among the most lonely people in our society. This is why I have been so encouraged to read about the circle of friends you have there.


I am one who is rapidly approaching this age group. In my reading today from Hebrews 11:13 , it said “All these people were still living by faith when they died.” Now hopefully I am a long way off from that yet, but it is a real challenge to “live by faith” and stay really close to the Lord as time goes on. I want to one of those who do.


Then it says”They did not receive the things promised; they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance” I know the context here is they were looking forward to Christ and His coming. But I realized we may not always see the answers to our prayers in our lifetime. Answers to prayers for many in scripture did not come for many hundreds of years in some cases, but they did come. God is faithful. Let’s be encouraged.


(Sorry if this is a bit of a digression from the thread here)


Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6
 
WP Forum Server by ForumPress | LucidCrew
Version: 99.9; Page loaded in: 0.08 seconds.