Forums

fact or fiction ...

Page:   1 2 3 4
 
 

oooooo
 
Joined in 2006
December 7, 2010, 18:38

trying not to be long winded with my introduction to this subject I will simply start with this


How do you deal with the differences between faith and logic when it comes to the Bible / Word of God?


Do you believe the Bible is the literal WOG?

and

if so how do you reconcile the amazing amount of contradictions within the pages?


I am facing a fresh dilemma on this subject – My study gives me more and more doubt that it can be the literal WOG but my spiritual times with God/HS or whoever or whatever do not cease, the prophetic continues to flow in and through me and so with both these totally opposite polars I am beside myself with where do I sit …


I had a student (public school )ask me today if I believed in Jesus and the bible … and this has been my dilemma for quite some time …



mrg
 
Joined in 2010
December 7, 2010, 23:42

The Jews never believed Genesis was a literal account of creation. It speaks the truth in a way a history of faith should. And yes, God speaks through that into our context.


But it was never meant to be a science text book – when you start reading it that way, that’s when the contradictions get in the way.


Things like the Psalms, for instance, are songs and poetry, and were never meant to be literal truth. They are a beautiful expression of the struggle the people of God have had with faith through the years. Sometimes there is good. Sometimes there is crap. Always there is God. God speaks through the Psalms, but we don’t read them as science either.


Even te things we do take literally (the instructions of Jesus in the gospels, the teaching of the epistles etc) need to be placed in their own cultural context. I say again, they are not science, but are a record of God breaking into our world and our struggle to respond. That struggle continues. We learn from God through the words of scripture, but we need to discern how to apply them in our context.


I believe in Jesus. He was a real man and also the son of God, who came to give us life to the full. I believe the Bible too, but I’m not a literalist/fundamentalist – that takes more faith than I’ll ever have!


Hope that makes sense. Happy to clarify if it causes more confusion though!


MRG



Anthony Venn-Brown
 
Joined in 2005
December 8, 2010, 21:16

welcome to the stages of a faith journey Tez……everything is up for challenge.


I think we all believed that our faith would remain the same forever and ever amen……..and when it actually starts to evolve we think we are losing it……..but no…..its just growing and evolving.


http://www.theocentric.com/spirituality/christian_living/stages_of_faith_a_map_for_the.html


If you want to read something more academic on this read Fowlers Stages of Faith there is an overview here http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/2219.htm



Ann Maree
 
Joined in 2008
December 9, 2010, 00:11

Hi avb


I love what you’ve said above. That really resonates with me. Thank you! 🙂


I’ve found that various types of life crises have produced a chaotic effect, thus putting me in a spin. Everything is tossed in the air and suddenly there are no reference points for what to believe in. lt’s been scary and often taken me to places of deep despair but now I see those times as important for my growth. St John of the Cross referred to these really testing times as “dark nights of the soul” and I’ve come to love that phrase. Can’t say I love the experiences when I’m in them though. 🙁


To answer your question Tez, I agree with Matt that a lot of the bible was never intended to be read literally. And in terms of the bible being penned as if by some supernatural event, untainted by human error (which is how we were taught at church), I definitely don’t believe that. There’s lots of human tainting throughout and misinterprations layered over the messages. And yet I still see the beauty within scripture. So despite the interference of humans, I still think the bible has sacred, inspired content. Learning about the richness of ancient cultures, original language and meanings at bible college helped put things in context for me. I found this opened my understanding, giving me a thirst to discover more. And that was deeply meaningful in and of itself, probably far more than the idea of God’s hand coming out of the sky to pen a book!


I guess I’ve also developed a softer view of human frailty and this has helped me see the human face of the bible in a positive light. So rather than perceiving our feeble attempts and failings to be close to God as horrible weaknesses to be ashamed of, I see them as precious steps toward becoming whole. It took me quite a few years to reach this point though. And I also believe the path toward God, love and goodness is wider and more inclusive than we were taught. For me, that means allowing the integration of other philosophies, faiths and sacred writings into my life as well as the bible.


I don’t know if this helps. Good, thought provoking question however.


Blessings,


Ann Maree



Myfanwe
 
Joined in 2007
December 9, 2010, 14:57

This is a great thread and a terrific question, Tez. I don’t think I have ever really (or at least never for long) believed that the Bible was the dictated word of God. Inspired, yes, but as a fiction writer, my understanding of inspiration, is very different to that of Literalist/Fundamentalist Christians.


When I get inspired with an idea, I then write that idea into a story which contains the idea, but it is not literally the idea, if that makes sense?


I believe the same is true of the Bible. Men were inspired by something they held to be true and wrote stories, poems and songs in order to convey that truth. The stories, poems and songs are not meant to be THE literal truth, but they contain the seed of it.


The Gospels, and histories on the other hand are eyewitness accounts of events, and even they will be coloured by the perceptions and beliefs of the witness recounting the story.


Yes, I believe Jesus lived and I believe he is the Son of God. The stories about him in the Bible are accounts passed down to us from people who knew him and walked with him, and they will bear both similarities and differences because of the personal filters and perceptions of the men and women who passed them on to us.


I don’t find that there’s terribly much conflict between faith and logic when I take this approach.


Blessings,



oooooo
 
Joined in 2006
December 9, 2010, 18:03

my dilemma is that i was raised to believe the bible as the literal and precise wog

plus when i went to bible college and all the churches i have been involved in also believed it is true correct and accurate


so i am needing to unlearn that concept


yet in my mind it can not possibly be literally true


but then that poses more questions for me

if it is not, then it stands to reason churches/preachers could only give generalised teachings, messages,

not being able to rule over people with regulations and rules and laws as so many do …


so I guess many churches do believe it is the literal

and just close their eyes to the obvious contradictions and falsehoods within the pages


my dilemma extends to spiritual practices outside those approved by the majority of christian churches/denominations …


but that is another story lol



Ann Maree
 
Joined in 2008
December 9, 2010, 19:46

Hi Tez


That’s interesting that your bible college favoured a literal approach. It surprises me as one of the very first basics they taught in my college was about the various methods of writing used in the bible, such as parables. The latter were a common way of teaching spiritual truths in many ancient cultures. And clearly when Jesus spoke them, both he and the audience knew they were not to be literally interpreted.


And with the creation story in Genesis, it’s funny how literalists/fundamentalists would be more comfortable believing that there must have been incest in order for Adam and Eve to continue to populate the earth than they are to accept the story as symbolic/allegorical.


There’s different ways of judging something as “true, correct and accurate”. I mean the psalms are beautiful poems, expressing all the human emotions from struggle to praise and triumph that you could imagine. So just because they’re a record of subjective and very human experiences, are they any less true and accurate? I don’t think so. In fact because I relate to them so much and because I love the arts, they resonate very much with the truth of who I am and how I express myself. Meanwhile someone with a different personality might relate more with other aspects of the bible and that’s no less valid. And with parables, they tell a story in a simple, pictorial way that makes them accessible to everyone no matter what their education etc. The spiritual truth is contained within a story that’s an example so although it’s not an actual event that’s being reported, what could be more true than wisdom that’s given to all who are willing to hear? It’s a powerful way to get a message across that’s easy to remember.


The other thing is that even when preachers/teachers use creative licence (or are just plain ignorant) when interpreting the bible in relation to original contexts, God can still move and heal. And for the most part, I don’t believe a lot of church leaders are consciously trying to manipulate the truth. I don’t even think they are turning a blind eye as much as uneducated. And even for those who are taking full advantage of others by knowingly twisting the truth, God can still move. I recall the Steve Martin movie about the faith healer who was a fake and yet miracles happened. That put him into a bit of a crisis where he had to consider that perhaps God did exist.


The process of unlearning can take some time and can be really difficult. I remember those times of uncertainty and feeling really disoriented. After a while however I came to enjoy my own seeking of the truth, not relying on what I was told either in the church or outside of it. I started checking everything against multiple sources of information and tried to find the original translations rather than others’ interpretations upon which to base my beliefs. I think being open minded and learning to cope with the unknown is part of the journey. And that’s scary stuff for a lot of people from fundamentalism where things tend to be taught as black and white or absolute. There’s comfort in certainty and I recall being overwhelmed by a world of independent thinking beyond my church experiences. The sky was the limit in terms of how much truth was available to me…but where to start? I wanted someone to spoon feed me rather than be free falling without a parachute. It was terrifyingly daunting and painful but I see now it was necessary for me to mature.


I think it helps if you like learning too.


Blessings,


Ann Maree



Ann Maree
 
Joined in 2008
December 9, 2010, 20:02

Hi Meg


You said: This is a great thread and a terrific question, Tez. I don’t think I have ever really (or at least never for long) believed that the Bible was the dictated word of God. Inspired, yes, but as a fiction writer, my understanding of inspiration, is very different to that of Literalist/Fundamentalist Christians.


When I get inspired with an idea, I then write that idea into a story which contains the idea, but it is not literally the idea, if that makes sense?


I believe the same is true of the Bible. Men were inspired by something they held to be true and wrote stories, poems and songs in order to convey that truth. The stories, poems and songs are not meant to be THE literal truth, but they contain the seed of it.


I love how you say this, Meg, and agree. And containing the truth doesn’t make it any less special in my mind. But I think that notion frightens some fundamentalists because they see it as a weakening of the bible somehow. I don’t see it like that.


You said: The Gospels, and histories on the other hand are eyewitness accounts of events, and even they will be coloured by the perceptions and beliefs of the witness recounting the story.


Well and even the gospels were written 70, 90 and ?120 years after the fact so there’s bound to be some things that were forgotten/changed by the time they were actually recorded.. I mean, I thought I was a reliable witness when I came forward to help with an assault. It was a few days later and I realised how little I actually recalled as the policeman had to ‘help’ me with the evidence.


Blessings,


Ann Maree



Anthony Venn-Brown
 
Joined in 2005
December 9, 2010, 21:30

No one was more suprised than me to find my faith again. I knew i would never be straight……so believed I’d be destined to hell. So why torture myself I thought……and walked away. It came back. miraculously…..very simply……very profoundly….very universal….things I’d previously held as truth no longer seemed to ring true any more…….I know longer had or needed all the answers. WHAT A RELIEF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


this was the great mystery……I found God in not knowing.



Ann Maree
 
Joined in 2008
December 9, 2010, 21:36

Hi avb


You said:


this was the great mystery……I found God in not knowing.


That’s beautiful. Thank you!


Blessings,


Ann Maree


Page:   1 2 3 4
 
WP Forum Server by ForumPress | LucidCrew
Version: 99.9; Page loaded in: 0.094 seconds.